It
Takes Two to Tango
Sexual
preferences are often a point of contention in modern society.
Personal beliefs can often taint one's ability to view a situation
subjectively, no matter which side you are on. Both sides have been
known to go to the extreme in support of their cause, often imposing
it on others with selfish disregard. Two young gentlemen have
recently been thrust into the spotlight for their choice of partner
in love, being met with strong support of those who wish to not see
them torn asunder by what they call unfair and homophobic actions.
Others have discounted their love, claiming although it “occurs
naturally in nature, [it] doesn't mean it's right”.
Buddy
and Pedro have a bromance for the ages; the friends groom each other,
swim together, and whisper sweet sounds of endearment. Once the
intent of separating the two in order to “take advantage of their
good genes by breeding them” reached public notice,
negative critique came pouring in from many sources with claims of
homophobia and exploitation. The pair are not the first to have the
public rise in support when their life choices are threatened. A
small commune of endangered couples in Germany were protected by
advocates when advisers attempted to introduce females to encourage
mating. Eventually, one of the couples was able to successfully
raise a child, paving the way for other couples in the colony.
Typically,
standing up for the rights of others is not a practise to be looked
down upon; trumpeting the cause for those who cannot speak for
themselves is noble and just. However, harsh criticism, such as
accusing groups of homophobia, without acknowledging all the details
can often blow a situation out of proportion and create an awkward
situation for all involved. Buddy and Pedro enjoy each other's
company, having lived their bachelorhoods together, but need to be
given a chance to explore their options. Some may disagree with the
methods of their elders, but often those who are outside the issue
are lacking in details to provide a proper opinion.
Conventional
wisdom says to stand up for what you believe in, no matter what the
cost. Amidst such excitement, group mentality can focus on specific
issues instead of the big picture. Jumping to conclusions can lead
to confusion and turn a slightly awkward situation into an
international issue other groups can use as a springboard. The best
method of action would be to assess the situation completely before
rushing in and accusing those involved.
In the
tale of Buddy and Pedro, bachelor African penguins of the Toronto
Zoo, the ending is a happy one. They are still allowed to spend time
together, merely being separated to hopefully help continue their
species with some lucky ladies. Those who reviewed the entire
situation would see that no one was trying to split up the two, and
that “they will be allowed to renew their relationship” after
helping rejuvenate their species. Hopefully this will serve as a
lesson in exploring all aspects of an issue before making a snap
judgment.
