27 July, 2011
Humble Indie Bundle 3.0
I made a post about the previous Humble Bundle and the awesome things they're doing for charity. The boys are bringing it around again with five new indie titles as incentive for your hard earned cash.
Since Humble Bundle have started their endeavor, they have raised over one million dollars to help Child's Play make children smile! This little bundle of joy would be a great way to unwind after an intense session of hardcore gaming while earning yourself a bit of good karma.
22 July, 2011
Random Omegle Trolling 1
You're now chatting with a random stranger. Say hi!
Official messages from Omegle will not be sent with the label 'Stranger:'. Strangers claiming to represent Omegle are lying.
You: Wow, Ryan, is that you?
Stranger: yepp
You: Fuck yeah. Dude, I've been trying to find you since that first night we talked for like hours.
Stranger: awesome
You: I was so heartbroken when your internet connection lagged out and I didn't get your facebook info yet.
Stranger: oh really im sorry
Stranger: that sucked
You: Funny thing about sucking, I was totally going to suck your dick.
Stranger: creep?
You: But that was like five years ago and I've had gender reassignment surgery since then.
Stranger: sick.
Stranger: your really a girl?
Stranger: boy*
You: Depends on what you like, Ryan. I kept my originals, just added some new fun parts.
Stranger: dude you've changed you nasty bitch.
You: But, you said you were down with that when we first talked!
You: You're the one who has changed!
Stranger: i was young and stupid than. now all i know is that we met on the internet
You: I THOUGHT YOU ACCEPTED ME FOR WHO I AM!?
Stranger: and i dont know you.
You: Don't say that, Ryan. It breaks my heart!
You: I LOVE YOU RYAN
You: DON'T DENY ME
You: I LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOVE YOU
Stranger: DUDE IM JUST MESSING WITH YOU THIS ISNT RYAN FUCK FACE
You: THE OH'S STAND FOR MILLIONS OF MILES FOR EACH ONE
You: DON'T LIE TO ME RYAN
You: I KNOW IT IS YOU
You: YOU EVEN TYPE THE SAME WAY
Stranger: who the fuck is ryan
Stranger: DOESNT MEAN IM RYAN DIPSHIT.
Stranger: IM A FUCKING FEMALE
You: DOES TOO, YOU'RE MY RYANASAURUS REX!
Stranger: WTF CREEPER
You: Shit, that's cool, I like chicks too.
You: Wanna fuck?
Stranger: your bi?
Stranger: WTF
Stranger: helll no
You: Why not?
You: I've got the best of all worlds, lady.
Stranger: cause im all straight
You: It's coo', I still have a dick.
Stranger: FUCK YOU BITCH
You: :(
Your conversational partner has disconnected.
Official messages from Omegle will not be sent with the label 'Stranger:'. Strangers claiming to represent Omegle are lying.
You: Wow, Ryan, is that you?
Stranger: yepp
You: Fuck yeah. Dude, I've been trying to find you since that first night we talked for like hours.
Stranger: awesome
You: I was so heartbroken when your internet connection lagged out and I didn't get your facebook info yet.
Stranger: oh really im sorry
Stranger: that sucked
You: Funny thing about sucking, I was totally going to suck your dick.
Stranger: creep?
You: But that was like five years ago and I've had gender reassignment surgery since then.
Stranger: sick.
Stranger: your really a girl?
Stranger: boy*
You: Depends on what you like, Ryan. I kept my originals, just added some new fun parts.
Stranger: dude you've changed you nasty bitch.
You: But, you said you were down with that when we first talked!
You: You're the one who has changed!
Stranger: i was young and stupid than. now all i know is that we met on the internet
You: I THOUGHT YOU ACCEPTED ME FOR WHO I AM!?
Stranger: and i dont know you.
You: Don't say that, Ryan. It breaks my heart!
You: I LOVE YOU RYAN
You: DON'T DENY ME
You: I LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOVE YOU
Stranger: DUDE IM JUST MESSING WITH YOU THIS ISNT RYAN FUCK FACE
You: THE OH'S STAND FOR MILLIONS OF MILES FOR EACH ONE
You: DON'T LIE TO ME RYAN
You: I KNOW IT IS YOU
You: YOU EVEN TYPE THE SAME WAY
Stranger: who the fuck is ryan
Stranger: DOESNT MEAN IM RYAN DIPSHIT.
Stranger: IM A FUCKING FEMALE
You: DOES TOO, YOU'RE MY RYANASAURUS REX!
Stranger: WTF CREEPER
You: Shit, that's cool, I like chicks too.
You: Wanna fuck?
Stranger: your bi?
Stranger: WTF
Stranger: helll no
You: Why not?
You: I've got the best of all worlds, lady.
Stranger: cause im all straight
You: It's coo', I still have a dick.
Stranger: FUCK YOU BITCH
You: :(
Your conversational partner has disconnected.
16 July, 2011
English, 111 (Argumentative Essay)
I hate five paragraph essays. This essay is pretty lame.
Eureka
Tensions are always high in the Senate. With the well being of the Nation at stake, it is important for Senators to focus on the real issues affecting the country and use their allotted time to enact laws for the common good. With that in mind, one can see why there is such a heated debate over the controversial laws affecting the sale of incandescent light bulbs set to come into play beginning January 2012. Incandescent bulbs are to be slowly phased out for the more efficient compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs). Lawmakers are very polarized when it comes to this topic for many reasons; proponents of the movement cite the energy efficiency and environmental factors, while dissenters are outraged over the possible legislative precedent being set. Although one can empathize with the worry of encroaching upon consumers' rights, this is an instance where the risk is worth the potential gain.
Light is something many seem to take for granted, a basic necessity of our modern times with a surprising price tag. Energy Star, run by the U.S. Department of Energy to research energy usage and its effects states “lighting accounts for close to 20 percent of the average home's electric bill” (Energy Star 1). CFLs may have a higher cost at initial purchase, but they last 100 times longer while using nearly 75 percent less energy for an average savings of 70 dollars (AJ). Some companies, such as Duke Energy, have embraced the initiative by offering customers vouchers for free starter packs of CFLs replacements for their homes. Otheriwse, the 700 percent price different sounds grandiose without proper data. Comparing 50 cents versus $3.50 with the compounded over time savings makes for a weak counter-argument even in a time of financial crisis.
Another advantage which cannot be ignored is the environmental impact the transition will enumerate. Incandescents use 90 percent of their power resources to produce heat, causing the temperature to rise as much as 5 degrees per hour in some rooms. CFLs burn 6 times cooler, using only 35 percent of their power to produce heat with the rest emitting light. Although CFLs currently contain a small amount of mercury, if properly recycled, the decrease in power demands actually lessens the amount of mercury emissions used by a single light source by 30% (Energy Star 1). 45 percent of US electricity comes from coal based plants, primarily in the Southeastern and Midwestern states. For areas with a high dependency on coal, switching to CFLs is proven to decrease the amount of mercury released into the environment.
Opponents of the legislation view it as an affront on a consumer's right to make their own decisions on which bulbs to use in their homes. Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) accused supporters of “always want[ing] to do something that tell[s] us how to make our lives better” (Howell). Senator Jim Risch (R-Idaho) relayed “people in Idaho are just astonished that the federal government is telling them what kind of light bulb to put in their home” (Howell). Their statements come across as fear mongering as they chastise supporters by comparing the regulations to abortion issues and grossly skewing the language of the mandate into being a ban versus a progressive upgrade in technology. A more legitimate claim can be held for the concern over potential mercury difficulties and recycling protocols. Some have mentioned a discomfort with CFLs being made primarily in China, which seems biased since most manufacturing for a collection of daily use items takes places overseas.
Proper representation is an important aspect of the political system. Compact fluorescent lamps are a financially viable method of conserving non-renewable resources as well as cut down on pollution. Some view the transition as a threat against consumer rights, but the actual language of the legislation is outlined as a process to weed out out dated and wasteful alternatives via guidelines and regulations. Luckily, the brave elect are around to spend the time and effort to review important issues such as motions that were signed into law back in 2008 to protect the American right and way of life. God bless America.
Eureka
Tensions are always high in the Senate. With the well being of the Nation at stake, it is important for Senators to focus on the real issues affecting the country and use their allotted time to enact laws for the common good. With that in mind, one can see why there is such a heated debate over the controversial laws affecting the sale of incandescent light bulbs set to come into play beginning January 2012. Incandescent bulbs are to be slowly phased out for the more efficient compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs). Lawmakers are very polarized when it comes to this topic for many reasons; proponents of the movement cite the energy efficiency and environmental factors, while dissenters are outraged over the possible legislative precedent being set. Although one can empathize with the worry of encroaching upon consumers' rights, this is an instance where the risk is worth the potential gain.
Light is something many seem to take for granted, a basic necessity of our modern times with a surprising price tag. Energy Star, run by the U.S. Department of Energy to research energy usage and its effects states “lighting accounts for close to 20 percent of the average home's electric bill” (Energy Star 1). CFLs may have a higher cost at initial purchase, but they last 100 times longer while using nearly 75 percent less energy for an average savings of 70 dollars (AJ). Some companies, such as Duke Energy, have embraced the initiative by offering customers vouchers for free starter packs of CFLs replacements for their homes. Otheriwse, the 700 percent price different sounds grandiose without proper data. Comparing 50 cents versus $3.50 with the compounded over time savings makes for a weak counter-argument even in a time of financial crisis.
Another advantage which cannot be ignored is the environmental impact the transition will enumerate. Incandescents use 90 percent of their power resources to produce heat, causing the temperature to rise as much as 5 degrees per hour in some rooms. CFLs burn 6 times cooler, using only 35 percent of their power to produce heat with the rest emitting light. Although CFLs currently contain a small amount of mercury, if properly recycled, the decrease in power demands actually lessens the amount of mercury emissions used by a single light source by 30% (Energy Star 1). 45 percent of US electricity comes from coal based plants, primarily in the Southeastern and Midwestern states. For areas with a high dependency on coal, switching to CFLs is proven to decrease the amount of mercury released into the environment.
Opponents of the legislation view it as an affront on a consumer's right to make their own decisions on which bulbs to use in their homes. Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) accused supporters of “always want[ing] to do something that tell[s] us how to make our lives better” (Howell). Senator Jim Risch (R-Idaho) relayed “people in Idaho are just astonished that the federal government is telling them what kind of light bulb to put in their home” (Howell). Their statements come across as fear mongering as they chastise supporters by comparing the regulations to abortion issues and grossly skewing the language of the mandate into being a ban versus a progressive upgrade in technology. A more legitimate claim can be held for the concern over potential mercury difficulties and recycling protocols. Some have mentioned a discomfort with CFLs being made primarily in China, which seems biased since most manufacturing for a collection of daily use items takes places overseas.
Proper representation is an important aspect of the political system. Compact fluorescent lamps are a financially viable method of conserving non-renewable resources as well as cut down on pollution. Some view the transition as a threat against consumer rights, but the actual language of the legislation is outlined as a process to weed out out dated and wasteful alternatives via guidelines and regulations. Luckily, the brave elect are around to spend the time and effort to review important issues such as motions that were signed into law back in 2008 to protect the American right and way of life. God bless America.
15 July, 2011
14 July, 2011
13 July, 2011
12 July, 2011
09 July, 2011
English, 111 (Journal 4)
Write one page, double-spaced explaining you feel about overweight people in our society. Who is to blame? Do you think America is obsessed with being thin?
There once was a boy named Billy,
He found himself to often be chilly,
Arms were skinny, he looked a bit illy,
So he ate, and he ate, and he ate himself silly.
As Billy grew and grew, his girth often got him in trouble,
His mother was embarrassed, she thought it abominable,
Friends still loved him, for he was ever amicable,
But the doctor warned him, his actions were deplorable.
He ate his way through the h'ordeuvres,
Restaurants wanted his patronage everywhere,
A seven course meal in comparison to him was for amateurs,
Happily consuming, his stomach kept expanding while he was unaware.
He stuffed his mouth with his fists,
Nothing else in the world seemed to exist,
He downed an entire chicken without any assist,
His face turned blue, his eyes bulged as he asphixed.
Poor Billy was too big to save, his life met its aorist.
There once was a boy named Billy,
He found himself to often be chilly,
Arms were skinny, he looked a bit illy,
So he ate, and he ate, and he ate himself silly.
As Billy grew and grew, his girth often got him in trouble,
His mother was embarrassed, she thought it abominable,
Friends still loved him, for he was ever amicable,
But the doctor warned him, his actions were deplorable.
He ate his way through the h'ordeuvres,
Restaurants wanted his patronage everywhere,
A seven course meal in comparison to him was for amateurs,
Happily consuming, his stomach kept expanding while he was unaware.
He stuffed his mouth with his fists,
Nothing else in the world seemed to exist,
He downed an entire chicken without any assist,
His face turned blue, his eyes bulged as he asphixed.
Poor Billy was too big to save, his life met its aorist.
07 July, 2011
06 July, 2011
05 July, 2011
Art for Games, 117 (Character Manipulation)
04 July, 2011
02 July, 2011
English, 111 (Create a Word)
Post your creative original word along with extended defintion to Dicussion Board.
Racholasperysm - [Ra - kol - as - per - riz - uhm]
- noun
Spasms caused by unbridled rage due to multiple uncontrollable circumstances wreaking havoc on a being's state of being.
"The long list of troubles sent Kaila into a racholasperysm."
Fuck you cat, fuck you Windows.
But mostly you, cat.
Racholasperysm - [Ra - kol - as - per - riz - uhm]
- noun
Spasms caused by unbridled rage due to multiple uncontrollable circumstances wreaking havoc on a being's state of being.
"The long list of troubles sent Kaila into a racholasperysm."
Fuck you cat, fuck you Windows.
But mostly you, cat.
01 July, 2011
English, 111 (Cause and Effect Essay)
Cause/Effect of a controversial song and their intentions behind it. 750 words required.
I honestly think having the required word count ruined it. I had to add about 400 words to the "finished piece". Might fix it eventually.
If you haven't heard of Labi Siffre, you should definitely check him out. He's a wonderful humanitarian and a great artist.
Twitter
Blog
Seriously, this one sucks.
I honestly think having the required word count ruined it. I had to add about 400 words to the "finished piece". Might fix it eventually.
If you haven't heard of Labi Siffre, you should definitely check him out. He's a wonderful humanitarian and a great artist.
Blog
Seriously, this one sucks.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)